Open source can protect your virtualized network. Here’s how.


Open source software is like having a neighborhood watch security team

Virtualization has been a hot topic in telecommunications for nearly half a decade. As networks migrate from hardware to software, and ‘walled gardens’ turn into much more open cloud-like architectures, so security risks increase.

Throwing open source software development into the mix adds a further layer of complexity.

If large numbers of developers across the world can manipulate the code of a piece of software, doesn’t this increase the risk of malicious code being introduced? And if code is visible to anyone, isn’t it going to be much easier to find, and capitalise on, vulnerabilities?

The answer is no. Just because a software is open source it doesn’t mean that it is more vulnerable. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Balancing the risks

While the risk of someone implanting a malicious piece of code is conceivable, the mechanisms of the open source community would ensure that it’s not there for very long. Open source code is inspected by a lot of people. I would go as far as to say that it is reviewed and audited much more than closed source code. So, while the risk is there in principle, any rogue code would get flushed out pretty rapidly.

When it comes to attacks from the outside, there is little difference between hacking an open source or a closed source application.

In the case of a probing attack – where hackers identity software weaknesses from the way the application responds to a range of prompts – the tools and processes used are the same for both closed and open source.

Another approach, static code analysis, is ostensibly easier in open source because the code is fully visible. However, the fact that the code is closed doesn’t mean that you cannot read it. There are enough tools in the market that allow you to decompile the code, so the hacker can find those soft spots without having the code itself. Hence the risk levels are no different between the two domains.

A global community to fend off threats

Open source has the potential to be more secure than a closed source application. The transparency which characterizes the open source environment translates into a much greater incentive to identify threats and root them out quickly.

It’s also less likely for vulnerabilities to creep in inadvertently. Compared to closed source developers, the open source community tends to invest much more time in polishing code before submitting it for inspection. After all, developers are putting their professional reputation on the line with a large, global audience.

Reaching critical mass

How effectively an open source project can stay on top of security risks depends entirely on the size of its support base. Ultimately, this could create more stumbling blocks for the adoption of NFV/SDN networks.

The full version of this blog first appeared in VanillaPlus on 8th May 2017.

This blog is part of our ONAP Insider series, which takes you behind the scenes, offering a more in-depth look at the workings of ONAP, how it is changing business models, simplifying network design and untapping new business opportunities for service providers, content developers and end-users.  Go to ONAP Insider.

One Comment

  1. Posted June 9, 2017 at 10:28 am | Permalink

    I believe open source is good but Software piracy is a crime. Its really a good topic to share and discuss to find perfect solution.

Join the Conversation

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>